Last shot of the day on a film set, also the last name of the author of this blog. Martin - Latin singular, those soldiers who work for Mars, God of War. A smith. In this lifetime of words, music and film. AKA "The Afterlife Expert" (Coast to Coast AM) If you want to reach me, I can be found on FB, LinkedIn, or Gmail under MartiniProds (my youtube channel)
Drops in one week. See what over 20 million viewers on Quora have seen (21 and counting) in terms of research and data.
21 million views of the "Hacking the Afterlife" forum
Hypnotherapists accessing information that cannot be cryptomnesia or remembered details, people speaking directly to loved ones on the flipside, people hearing directly from people no longer on the planet with new information - via guided meditation, mediumship or hypnotherapy.
"See! Hear! Experience!" I cannot bring myself to say "Talking to the Dead" because they cannot be dead if they're talking.
Cannot be gone if they're giving new information. Cannot be a figment of imagination when so many thousands report the exact same thing. The experience of talking to the afterlife (people back home) is subjective - but we can objectively examine the data of the thousands who have already done so, who have already experienced talking to loved ones on the flipside.
As Robert Towne put it recently; "I spent my whole life convinced the afterlife did not exist. And now I am convinced it does. What happened?" As I pointed out, it wasn't because of the numerous sessions with Jennifer Shaffer, or my incessant observations - it was because he had the first person experience of chatting to someone no longer on the planet who revealed only information he could know, only information that he could be aware of, or gave him new information he wasn't aware of and turned out to be accurate.
I'm safe in saying "This film will blow your mind." Literally. Should come with a warning. "Mind may be blown. View with caution." It's the accumulation of ten years of filming lightning in a bottle - in cafes, noisy restaurants, clips on TV shows I was involved in creating, or just mind bending evidence that life goes on.
Don't watch it if you aren't prepared to know how the play ends. Watch it if you are curious how it might end.
As Harry Dean Stanton puts it (In the film, speaking from the Flipside) "Tell people to believe in the possibility of an afterlife and then they won't waste another minute of their lives arguing about it like I did.." Wise words.
A Quoran posted this comment yesterday and I read it aloud to my family over lunch. They often wonder what the hell I'm doing or why. Kind of summed it up.
“In my quest to seek out the answers, no matter the time required, and efforts proven to take to get there, I'm still stifled how you, actually “get it". How you, among countless millions, remove ALL personal opinion, and submit your findings, while remaining absolutely neutral in its entirety.
YOU, stand alone, and in a league for which few reside. The realm for which the 5% of humanity, provide instruction to living 95%. The sheep of existence as its come to be known.
While almost all, subject their findings, altered with a spiritual belief, or feelings they are opposed to, and which severely alters proper instruction, and educated guidance, you sir, do not.
Clearly sir, you aren't quite human, lol, but instead, one continually educating himself, and as one could question, arguably brought forth from one of the 135 levels or tiers as is were, of higher existence, that provide instruction to the common spirit in the afterlife.
To have come across someone worthy of this respect, I personally wish to thank you for educating the many whom come across your findings.
I cannot say just how it disgusts me to see so many submissions, whereby personal opinion, religious belief, counter properly educating the sherp that read their books, or submissions.
I wish you nothing less than the reverence we have, for the great literary scholars of the middle ages, that endlessly seen criticism from their time period, whom finally have the respect they deserve, just thousands of years later.
It's been a pleasure to follow your submissions.
Take care.”
My wife asked how I responded, told her I wrote “Mom, you gotta stop posting comments.” (Just kidding.)
If the research helps people it’s not my fault or ability. It's just research. I'd offer that folks aren't sheep… but nothing wrong with sheep, they too are walking us home. Just enjoying it more than we do.
Each week, Jennifer Shaffer and I have chats with folks on the flipside. That is, people no longer on the planet. Are we speaking to a floating ghost? Or an echo of a consciousness? Or a pool of consciousness? Perhaps it's worth looking at the "process" involved.
Jennifer is a medium who works with law enforcement agencies nationwide on missing person cases. She's used to jaded skeptics asking her questions and having their minds blown by her giving details that turn out later on to be evidence.
By her "solving" a mystery by seeing the events that took place. She's not always able to do so - sometimes people can't project what happened to them, or she misinterprets the visuals, sounds or senses she is getting. But when she's correct - she's correct. (Ask Bill Bratton, former NYPD commissioner about her.)
Jennifer and George Noory of Coast to Coast
What's the process?
I had a dream last night where I was speaking to Luana Anders and she said something that made me laugh, but it was a lightning quick thought. I mean, she passed along something funny to me, I laughed, said "I get it" before she fully formed it - like I was on the same engram or thought path with her.
And then a second later, after I said "That's funny!" I could not access it. That is me - Richard - the guy on the planet in bed having a dream where I'm talking to Luana, and I realize we're in mid conversation.
But my higher self - the two thirds left behind - got her joke. And that guy laughed before she could finish saying it. But because the mind of "me" (Richard in bed guy) is not lightning swift, I couldn't hold onto it - because it was in her mind.
So I tried to ask her - consciously - "What was it you were referencing?" She replied "Access and process." Meaning - "It's about the process - and how we access our higher selves."
So this post is about process and access. How we access people who are no longer on the planet. We are connected to them at all times (not aware of it), and since no one disappears or goes to nothingness, we all "return home" - a portion of them is always accessible. Not a "floating, meandering" portion - but one that is connected to their "higher consciousness" which is aware of all of their lifetimes (as well as ours. Just ask.)
We have filters that block our access to that information, but those filters can be altered or adjusted during a near death event, out of body experience, taking hallucinogens, using meditation or under deep hypnosis. The filters - the things that prevent us from accessing this information on a daily basis - are firmly in place. (For "filter references" in research, I recommend Dr. Greyson's "Is consciousness produced by the brain?" or Dr. Wambach's "Reliving Past Lives" where she suggests the "hypervigilant" left brain blocks the information received (the brain functioning like a stereo receiver.)
As they are altered when we are asleep.
In dreams. However - we can be open to their being altered while awake. And to do that, just "open one's mind up to the possibility that there is an afterlife" and things will spring forth. In the previous post, I mentioned how a close friend suddenly realized her pal who died ten years ago was "hanging out with her." She had written me suddenly, saying that "It feels like this guardian or guide is with me now and is showing herself to me. I can feel and hear her."
I wrote: "Ask her who she is." A few minutes later, she said "Oh my God! It's Sharon!" I knew Sharon - my pal's close friend in high school - but Sharon is keeping an eye on her since she checked off the planet ten years ago. For ten years she had "no idea" who that person might be, never mentioned it to anyone (except to me once in an email, that someone "makes her feel completely at peace when she shows up.") Told no one. Claimed who she was to no one.
And then when asked the question "Who are you?" she replied. Gave her a visual of who she is. That kind of verification will mean nothing to someone who hasn't experienced it. The super skeptics will remain super skeptics - until they have the same experience. That's how the mind works. Super skeptical until it's no longer useful.
I got a note from someone on Quora who self identified as a skeptic, but wanted to try to self experiment. He wanted to see if he could access someone no longer on the planet; his mother who had died some years ago.
He followed the method I recommended; imagined her sitting across from him. He said “I tried the method, spent ten minutes just pretending to see my mother, did a simple meditation of creating her, what she was wearing, holding her hands. He said, then he asked her a simple question he wouldn't know the answer to: “Who greeted you when you crossed over?”
She replied (aloud, in his head) “Hugh Nessel.”
He had no clue who that was, so he reached out to his sister, the keeper of family histories, and she said “That was mother's maternal grandfather. You never met him because he died before you were born."
He wrote to tell me that this incident had "shaken him to his core." He had tried a simple self experiment... and the results surprised him.
Super skeptics will tell us that everything is cryptomnesia, something we heard before, or created with our minds, which are locked in place by the brain, and die with us upon departure. That he must have heard this name somewhere someplace in his lifetime and that he just forgot it.
But you see - that doesn't acknowledge the experiential portion. Which is "hearing his mother's voice saying new information that he had not heard before." He had never heard her say "Hugh Nessel." (Or had any access to it). And when he did hear her say it, he was startled to "hear her voice" but didn't say "Oh, right, that old duffer." He was confused because he didn't know who that could be. She said a name completely foreign to him, but in her own voice, which he knew was hers.
But his sister set him straight.
Someone he never met, who died before he was born, whose name would not be common knowledge. (This is just one of dozens of examples I can recount.)
Harry Dean and his pal Bill
Harry Dean Stanton showed up in a conversation with Jennifer Shaffer a week before his memorial service. He gave me three messages to give his close friends at the service. Details about issues relating to their health that they had not told anyone, was not common knowledge. I went up to each of them and told them at the memorial service. They were flabbergasted.
I asked Harry what he wanted me to say at his Memorial - he said "Tell people to believe in the afterlife." I laughed. "Harry, you were a famous atheist. None of your friends is going to believe I spoke to you." He said "Then tell them to believe in the possibility of an afterlife so then they won't waste another minute of their life arguing about it like I did." Sage words.
Finally, someone on Quora asked me the same question today - "How do we know we are connected to our higher selves, so I can, for example, figure out the right trade to make? How do you differentiate between your own inner voice and the voice of your guide(s) or loved ones who are trying to communicate. How do I know whom to thank for the all the stock tips and subsequently, whom do I fault for not taking them ;) ?"
I replied:
"You mean Lottery numbers? Well, I always ask. They always laugh. I recommend adding intent. Who am I here to help or heal? Who am I here (in this lifetime) to make their lives happy or comfortable? Focus on the intent of the trade. Not on the self profit. But on who it will benefit. And I’m not referring to trades that are related to “good causes” (though of course that’s related) I’m referring to choices that relate to “why we are on the planet.”
I included a link from my film "Limit Up" which although cowritten with Luana Anders, was about how God (played by Ray Charles) was trying to manipulate the soybean market at the Chicago Board of Trade to end world hunger. (His assistant angel played by Danitra Vance.) I sent him a link to the film which is below.
But I included this in the reply:
The best detail I’ve heard came from a conversation with Michael Newton via Jennifer Shaffer during one or our chats with him on the flipside. (Showed up, offered insight, not by request, but just because he can). I asked him for a simple 1, 2, 3 for communication. He said “Say their name, ask your questions.” I asked “do you say the name aloud or in your head?” He said “Doesn’t matter.” I asked “So how can you tell when your actually making a connection rather than wishful thinking?” He said “When they answer the question before you can ask it.” I said “Is there a 3rd thing?” He said, “No, only two.”...
(Just like the Luana conversation from last night referenced above. She was telling me something and I got it before she said it aloud. But my "lesser" conscious self didn't "hear it" - but my "higher self" got the image and joke intended before she even finished the sentence. Hence this post about "access" and "process.")
Say their name. Ask your questions. If one is trying to access their higher self, I recommend just asking their guide. (If they don’t know who that is, learn who that is). The guide has access to one’s life plan - and can answer pretty much any question one might have. But don’t be surprised if when one is about to “Make a trade” and they ask their guide for advice and they say “And what do you plan to do with the money that you get from that successful trade?” If it isn’t part of one’s life plan, or path - perhaps avoid it."
His reply:
"The reason for my question, if I may. So, I’m standing in my kitchen, making myself a munchie snack. You know, high on life. As I have a moment of creative genius. I top my warm raspberry crumb coffee cake that is sitting on top of vanilla ice cream bar separated by a thin layer of Belgian chocolate with a double espresso. and Viola. I’m a legend in my own mind.
Before ever taking a bite I said to myself, “Oh, man. Grandpa would LOVE this!”…and before I finished the sentence I heard his voice in my head, loud and clear say the word “Vkustnyatsina”, or scrumptious in Russian. I freaked for a second. I know I heard his voice. I read all your stuff. I knew it was possible but…I know it was unmistakably his voice. But is it him, or is there an intermediary that is showing me that image and sound, as a means of establishing communications, as my guide? How would I know the difference. Is this my higher self sending me an image of him because I miss him?"
My reply:
"Wow. That gave me a chill... THAT’S EXACTLY IT. We have a hard time training ourselves not to judge events that occur. And that, my friend, was one of them. Vkustnyatsina! I love it. Scrumptious!!! Only you would know his voice. He’s been trying to talk to you for a long time. Finally! You listened! Very cool. Spasibo.
To which he replied:
"Thank you for the validation. I’m beyond words right now."
Beyond words.
It's a good place to be.
And now - in its 30th year, I bring you the epic film of "Limit Up" starring Ray Charles as God, Danitra Vance as his assistant, Nancy Allen as the soybean trader, Brad Hall as her BFF, Dean Stockwell as her boss. Luana Anders is in a scene asking me about soybeans. Enjoy something that is Beyond Words.
I've been answering questions about the flipside research on quora.com - it's a site where a global audience can ask questions on any topic, I answer those about my "Flipside" research. After my appearance on Coast to Coast 6/16, noticed a spike of people reading my posts; 2.33 million in the past 3 weeks. (12 million over the past couple years) Have no clue if any of them buy books, but it's fun to hope they might.
Last three months
Last year Past couple of years. Here are links to the books!!!! Thanks. BACKSTAGE PASS BOOKS BACKSTAGE PASS TO THE FLIPSIDEONE: BACKSTAGE PASS TO THE FLIPSIDETWO: BACKSTAGE PASS TO THE FLIPSIDE THREE:
FLIPSIDE FLIPSIDE FILM: IT'S A WONDERFUL AFTERLIFE ONE IT'S A WONDERFUL AFTERLIFE TWO HACKING THE AFTERLIFE TALKING TO BILL PAXTON FILM ARCHITECTURE OF THE AFTERLIFE: Here's an example of a recent message: To me: "You are obviously convinced but I see only conviction & belief in your words, not proof so I remain very sceptical. Produce some concrete scientific evidence if you want to be taken seriously." My reply: "You assume I want to be taken seriously. I don't want to be taken anywhere. I film. The footage exists. Look at it. Don’t look at it. The transcripts exist. Read them or don’t. The research still exists. Two things are required for data. Consistent results that are reproducible. We can debate how data is gathered. But when the data is both consistent and reproducible it doesn't change whether we consider it serious or not. I've filmed over 50 people saying the same things about the afterlife under deep hypnosis. I don't ask questions. I film. I’ve filmed interviews with about 50 people saying the same things without hypnosis. I did ask the questions. Same results without hypnosis. What they say is the same (identical/ word for word) to the research gathered by clinical psychologist Dr.. Helen Wambach in the 70s. I've studied her methodology, have her raw tapes. What her 2000 cases said (its 2750 with her 2nd book) is the same as what Michael Newton's 7000 reports say over 30 years published a decade later. The Newton institute continues to report their data. It hasn't changed. I approached my documentary “Flipside" as a skeptic. I was determined to report nothing if I saw nothing for 4 hours. That's not what happened. I remain a skeptic. Not about the research - that's just data. I'm skeptical about skepticism. Research shows we have filters on the brain that prevent people from accessing this information. For a science report on filters I recommend Dr. Greyson's talk “Is consciousness produced by the brain?” where he cites medical evidence that indicates it is "not only." So not everyone is going to be able to access this information. Shy of a near death event, LSD, OBE, deep hypnosis,guided meditation or some other filter altering event they won’t be able to access this information until the filters die. That's a shame. But not everyone signs up for a lifetime to have that experience or learn that information. As the late actor Harry Dean Stanton told me from the flipside when asked what he wanted me to say at his memorial - “tell people to believe in the afterlife." (It's in "Backstage Pass to the Flipside" book one) I laughed. I replied (via Jennifer Shaffer, a medium who works with law enforcement agencies nationwide on missing person cases) “Harry, all your pals are skeptics. None will believe I spoke to you.” So he gave me "concrete proof." Private messages about health issues to three of his closest friends only they would know. Details that only he could know from the afterlife. They were flabbergasted when I told them at the memorial… privately. You see - proof is private. I'm not allowed to alter a skeptic’s path unless their dear friend asks me to. Harry told me to tell them to “believe in the possibility of an afterlife so then they wouldn't waste another minute of their life arguing about it like he did.” (And he did spend alot of time doing so as I knew him and had heard a few hours worth. That's why I asked him "So Harry, what was it like to realize there actually is an afterlife?) But concrete proof won't change people’s minds or path. I can't do that. They have to do that shift of consciousness on their own. Seriously. Only a person's higher self can make that happen... perhaps by directing them to this page to read this very sentence. Doesn't get much seriouser than that. Seriously or cereally, or even serially. Enjoy the ride. Here's the latest stats for "all time content" while on Quora. Who knew?
