tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12157431.post6353242412288093405..comments2023-11-25T12:31:10.692-08:00Comments on The Martini Shot: A Shot of Martini Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12157431.post-14240614491241819002014-12-14T19:17:39.504-08:002014-12-14T19:17:39.504-08:00Here is the coast to coast show from Friday. Descr...Here is the coast to coast show from Friday. Description is accurate except Electra pieces found were in the Marshalls (not Saipan). This free link wont be up long. http://www.disclose.tv/forum/coast-to-coast-am-dec-12-2014-the-afterlife-t101918.htmlRich Martinihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08077690221180869981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12157431.post-37488720995307553622014-12-14T14:10:48.982-08:002014-12-14T14:10:48.982-08:00No need to have angst. It's all good. This re...No need to have angst. It's all good. This research isn't for everyone. If it bugs you, then let it go. Same goes with the Earhart research. The NTSB investigator I interviewed made the point about her plane. I told him they'd taken it to Japan (Saipan) along with her. He said "Well, that makes sense. Taking it all the way to mainland would be dangerous, they might lose it. So going to the nearest Japanese port makes sense." And if you watch the clip I included for you above - the US Marines who found it in a hangar in July of 44, they say (and I have 12 other eyewitnesses who say the same) that they saw the plane flown. So someone fixed it during the time from when it came down and lost its brake assembly and other parts, and was seen with a "broken wing" on the back of the Kyushu. My point is this - they had her plane, they fixed her plane, they kept her plane in a hangar at Aslito. Yes, I know they owned two Electras. Yes I know that Japanese planes were made of cloth prior to 1937. It is a leap to say they "reverse engineered" her plane - something the Japanese did quite a bit of in those days and after the war. I have no direct evidence of that. But I do have an NTSB expert, who has testified before Congress, who says it's his opinion that her plane was likely taken apart and put back together. And that's why it flew with the US forces found it. Again - this ain't opinion. It's eyewitness testimony. You can believe the Marines are lying, after meeting these guys, war heroes really, I tend to believe what they're saying. Like Louie Zamperini. They're too old to make it up. I have other veterans talking about the plane at earhartonsaipan.com - I'm fine with discussing theoretical models of what happened to the Electra. But theoretical models should not, cannot trump eyewitness evidence. Eyewitness evidence (I have 200 eyewitness account to date) can be wrong, but if it was made up - we would have seen other reports coming from Guam, Okinawa, or any other island chain in the Pacific. But we don't. We get reports that she came down in Mili, was arrested, and taken to Japan (Saipan). Not much to argue about here. You're welcome to your opinion, but I'm presenting the accounts of US Marines who saw her plane on Saipan, and then eyewitnesses who saw her arrested, saw the plane taken and transported there. Why people discount what they're saying (Because they don't speak English? I don't get it) is beyond me. But thanks for posting.Rich Martinihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08077690221180869981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12157431.post-9279821447473719832014-12-14T12:56:56.429-08:002014-12-14T12:56:56.429-08:00Best wishes Rich ... but whoever made the claim th...Best wishes Rich ... but whoever made the claim the Japanese wanted (seized) Amelia Earhart's Lockheed Electra in order to (figure out) how to build an aluminum aircraft is plain wrong.<br /><br />The (1934) Mitsubishi A5M was an all metal plane with a max speed up to 279 mph (vs 205 mph for a Lockheed 10E)<br /><br />That is just one issue that gave me pause. I do not mind fiction , or conspiracy theory , it is a big industry that sells a lot of books , which also is fine with me.<br /><br />My angst comes from how I enjoyed the first part of your CtoC interview regarding the afterlife , in my opinion it has a lot of merit and I would hate to toss that information into the fiction category . <br /><br />Hope that makes sense.Martin Woodsidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01731179657282482136noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12157431.post-14492206509383538772014-12-14T00:43:54.503-08:002014-12-14T00:43:54.503-08:00Thanks for the comment Martin. Yes, I would agree ...Thanks for the comment Martin. Yes, I would agree with you, if I hadn't interviewed 15 new eyewitnesses on Saipan and US Marines who saw her airplane. It does sound like BS... until you hear them speak in their own words. I posted links for you on this post. Again, this is not a belief of what happened to her - or a theory. These are merely eyewitness reports of what people saw or what their relatives experienced. The same way that Flipside and It's A wonderful afterlife are transcripts of between life sessions, transcripts of interviews. Don't blame the messenger. I'm just reporting what people have said. So don't believe me - I have no dog in this hunt. Believe them or don't believe them, that's up to you. But thanks for taking the time to post. RMRich Martinihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08077690221180869981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12157431.post-55557191049003884212014-12-13T20:06:53.939-08:002014-12-13T20:06:53.939-08:00You had me going pretty good on CtoC last night , ...You had me going pretty good on CtoC last night , pretty believable , until the Amelia Earhart BS , now I dont believe a thing you say. Sorry.<br /><br />Martin W.Martin Woodsidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01731179657282482136noreply@blogger.com